Report Library

July 18, 2009
Share

Welcome to the Report Library!

Below, please find reports & articles organized by the following categories:

My Articles

MPAA Reports

Runaway Production Reports & Studies

State & International Film Incentive Overview Guides

U.S. State Specific Reports

Canadian Reports

My Articles:

2007

Through the Looking Glass: Runaway Productions and ‘Hollywood Economics’, Published in University of Pennsylvania Law School Journal of Labor & Employment Law

2011/2012:

Down The Rabbit Hole: The Madness of State Film Incentives as a “Solution” to Runaway Production, published in University of Pennsylvania Law School Journal of Business Law (Winter 2012)

MPAA Reports:

2010 MPAA theatrical market stats

2010 MPAA Response to Tannenwald Report

2010 Film & TV Economic Impact on US

2009 MPAA Theatrical Market Stats

2009 MPAA Economic Impact Report

2008-State-by-State-Chart

2008 MPAA Theatrical Statistics

2007 MPAA Market Statistics

2006 MPAA Market Statistics

2006 MPAA Economic Impact of US Entertainment Biz

2006 MPAA sponsored report on NYC pircacy

2005 MPAA Market Statistics

2004 MPAA Market Statistics

2003 MPAA US Movie Attendence Report

2003 MPAA Market statistics

2003 MPAA 10 nation piracy comparison

2002 MPAA Market Statistics

2001 MPAA Market Statistics

2000 MPAA Movie Audience Report

2000 MPAA Market Statistics

1999 MPAA Market Statistics

Runaway Production Reports & Studies:

2011 Tax Foundation update report U.S. film incentives

2010 Center for Budget & Policy Report on Film Incentives

2010 Tax Foundation Report on State Film Incentives

2007 FTAC 301 Filing With U.S. Trade Rep. on Legality of Canadian Film Incentives

2005 Center for Entertainment Industry Data & Research Report

2005 LAEDC Report on Cost of Runaway Production for California

2004 Craig Report on Runaway Production from Canadian Perspective

2002 California Research Report for State Legislature on Runaway Production

2001 U.S. Commerce Department Report on Runaway Production

2001 CEIDR Runaway Production Report

2000 CEIDR Runaway Production Report

1999 Monitor Report

State Film Incentive Summary Reports:

2009 The Incentives Office Book of State Film Incentives

2008 Entertainment Partners State Tax Incentives Overview

State Specific Reports:

Arizona:

2008 AZ Dept. of Commerce Report on Film Incentives

California:

2012 Headway Project & UCLA Report on California Film Incentive

2011 LAEDC Economic Impact Study of CA film incentive

2011 CA research bureau update on film industry

2011 Ca. Film Commission incentive report

2010 LAEDC Entertainment & Media in L.A. Report

2010 Milken Inst. “Film Flight” Report on Cost of Runaway Production on CA

July 2010 FilmLA Production Activity

2009 LAEDC july economic forecast

2007 SF film industry report

On-Location Film Production Data 1993-2007

2005 LAEDC report on cost of runaway production

2005 EDD Report for Ca. Legislature on Film Industry

2005 LAEDC Film Industy Profile of California/LA County

2004 Ent. Econ. Inst./PMR Group Study on Employment & Earnings of CA Film Workers from 1991-2002

Connecticut:

2009 Fed. Reserve Cost Benefit Analysis of Conn. Film Credits

2008 Conn. Tourism Dept. Econ. Impact of Film Incentive

2006 UConn Economic Impact of Film, Arts & Tourism

Florida:

2009 Florida Analysis of Film Industry

Georgia:

2011 MPN/MPAA economic impact report on GA film incentive

Iowa:

2009 Iowa Dept. of Econ Development Report on Film Incentive

2009 Iowa Eye et al. vs. Iowa over film incentive program

2009 Nov. Polk County Court Ruling for Iowa Eye Entertainment

Louisiana:

2011 Louisiana BoxStar Consulting Report on film incentive program

2010: Stephen Friday’s ‘Behind the Scenes of Hollywood South’

2009 Louisiana ERA Economic Impact Report

2006 Louisiana ERA Economic Impact Report

2005 La. Legislative Fiscal Office Analysis of State Incentive Program

Massachusetts:

2011 Mass. DOR report on film incentive

2010 Mass DOR report

2009 Mass. Dept. of Revenue Report on Film Incentives

2008 Mass Dept. of Revenue Analysis of Film Incentive

2008 Plymouth Rock Studios Economic Impact Report

2006 Lens on the Bay State: Motion Picture Industry in Mass.

Michigan:

Michigan Film Office 2010 Annual Report

2011 EY economic impact report

2010 Michigan Senate Analysis re film incentives

2009 AEG Report on Michigan Tax Incentives

2009 MSU Report on State Film Incentive

New Mexico:

2009 Ernst & Young Economic Impact of NM Film Incentives

2008 NM State U. Economic Impact of Film Incentive

New York:

2011 NYS film credit report

2010 NYS film credit report

2009 NYS film credit report

2009 Ernst & Young Study of New York Film Incentive

2008 NYS film credit report

2007 NYS film credit report

2006 NYS film credit report

North Carolina:

2009 Ernst & Young economic impact of NC film incentive

Oregon:

2007 Oregon Economic Impact of Film & TV Biz

Texas:

2010 Texas Report on Film Incentives

Texas 2008 Economic Impact Report of Entertainment Industry

2007 Dallas Film Office PR on keeping Dallas Film in Dallas

Canada:

2011/12 Canadian Heritage Profile Report on Film Industry

2010 Effects of Foreign Location Shooting on the Canadian Film & Television Industry

2010 Dept. of Canadian Heritage Report on Economic Impact of Film industry

2009-2010 BC Film Activity Report

2009 BC Film Statistics Report

2009 toronto film stats

Ontario_Profile_2009-Final(2009-10-30)

2009 Dept. of Heritage Economic Impact of Film & TV in Canada

2007 Dept. of Heritage Economic Impact of Film & TV in Canada

2007/2008 BC Annual Film Activity Report

BC 2007 response to 2006 CEIDR report

2005 Dept. of Heritage Report on Decline of Foreign Film Production

2001 BC Report- Does Runaway Production Hurt the US

 


4 Responses to Report Library

  1. Jonathan Polansky on November 8, 2009 at 1:08 pm

    Thank you for your very interesting site.

    On Tuesday, November 10, the University of California, San Francisco, will release a report linking state film subsidies to youth smoking. The recruitment of hundreds of thousands of adolescents to smoke by their exposure to smoking on screen is a major public health issue, domestically and internationally. Indiscriminate public subsidies for films with tobacco imagery are in direct conflict with the states’ own compelling public health goals.

    On Tuesday, you can download a copy of the report at http://escholarship.org/uc/item/8nc8422j. I hope you’ll find it of interest. Please contact me with any questions.

  2. prof.Giuseppe Richeri on May 4, 2011 at 11:20 am

    Very interesting and useful information for our reserach!
    Best wishes

  3. [...] Almost every study on the economic impact from film incentive programs across the nation have unanimously shown film incentive programs do not pay for themselves and, at best, generate enough new revenue to offset between 14 to 30-cents of each dollar spent on the program.  Given this virtually universal finding for state film incentive programs from New Mexico to Louisiana to Massachusetts, how can the results for California be so different?  Fortunately, perhaps in anticipation of attacks from skeptics, the LAEDC report provides a detailed explanation: California’s rich history in film making has allowed the development of a deep pool of talented workers in the variety of occupations needed to produce a motion picture or television series. This makes it possible for the industry to find suppliers for almost all its needs within the state, keeping this economic activity here. Almost 92 percent of all the goods and services purchased by the industry are sourced within the state. [...]

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Subscribe

Facebook